LEGENDARY
MILESTONE

公平教育学:一视同仁实现平等还是因材施教追求公平?

作者:宾夕法尼亚大学教育学正教授


适合专业或兴趣方向 Interests

教育学,公平教育


学习目标 Learning Objective

如何解决学校的不平等

如何利用现有资源来支持所有学生

如何加强学校的公平实践



项目收获 Program Outcome

·   教授官方的个性化定制推荐信

· 科研项目成绩单

·   学术评估报告

·   独立第一作者全文发表的EI/CPCI索引的国际会议期刊



项目介绍 Program Description

       该课程将理论与实践相结合,探讨获取、包容、公平资源、偏见和自我反思等主题,并利用数据影响决策。本课程将为学生成为关注公平的教育者打下坚实的基础。本课程包括多种学习活动:以研讨会形式进行讨论,以文本/多媒体形式展示课程材料,合作学习小组活动,在线讨论和活动,以及讲座。



导师介绍 Instructor Introduction

本教授任宾夕法尼亚大学教育学正教授

主管环境教育合作组织(SEEC)联合主席

     


任职学校 University / College

     宾夕法尼亚大学(University of Pennsylvania),是一所全球顶尖的私立研究型大学,著名的八所常春藤盟校之一,北美顶尖大学学术联盟美国大学协会 14 所创始成员之一。宾大名列 2020U.S. News 美国最佳大学排名第 6 名,世界大学排名第 14 名,2020THE 世界大学排名第 11 名,并被普林斯顿评论评为十大梦想学校之一。2014 年,宾大被评为研究实力一级研究型大学(并列一级另有哥大、哈佛、麻省理工和斯坦福四所高校)。宾大有许多美国和国际学术奖项获得者,其中包括四名诺贝尔物理学奖得主,六名诺贝尔化学奖得主,八名诺贝尔医学奖得主,七名诺贝尔经济学奖得主。



项目大纲 Program Outline






Lecture 1 :




Objective: Students will unpack equity; what it is and is not.

学生将要去拆解、分析什么是公平,什么不是


Readings:

Dzulkifli, D. (2015). A global effort for educational equity. PhiDelta Kappan, 96(6), 69-71.https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721715575304

Ishimaru, A. M., & Galloway, M. K. (2021). Hearts and minds first:Institutional logics in pursuit of educational equity. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 57(3), 470-502.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20947459

Zhang, H. (2016). Educational equity research in the mainland ofchina : A historical perspective. International Education Journal, 15(4), 133-147.


Lecture 2:




Objective: Students will examine race, ethnicity, gender, identity,ability, and intersectionality in the context of public schoolingin the US.

学生将在美国公立学校的背景下考察种族、民族、性别、身份、能力和交叉性

Readings:

Annamma, S.A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/ability criticalrace studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race anddis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1-31/

Gorski, P. (2016). Rethinking the role of "culture" in educationalequity: From cultural competence to equity literacy. MulticulturalPerspectives (Mahwah, N.J.), 18(4), 221-226.https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2016.1228344

Iftikar, J.S., & Museus, S.D. (2018). On the utility of Asiancritical (AsianCrit) theory in the field of education.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(10),935-949.


Lecture 3:



Objective: Students will explore bias/anti-bias and self-reflectionand analyze how their ow biases may impact student outcomes.

学生将探索偏见/反偏见和自我反思,并分析他们的偏见如何影响学生的结果。

Readings:

Chen, D. W., Nimmo, J., & Fraser, H. (2009). Becoming a culturallyresponsive early childhood educator: A tool to support reflectionby teachers embarking on the anti-bias journey. MulticulturalPerspectives (Mahwah, N.J.), 11(2), 101-106.https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960903028784

Ravitch, S. M. (2021). Equitable teaching takes time and practicehere are strategies to help: How to Prepare Yourself—and YourStudents—to Discuss Race, Identity, and Equity. Harvard BusinessPublishing: Education. March 15, 2021.


Lecture 4:




Objective: Students will understand how a school’s data story canbe used to identify and address inequities across multiple domains.

学生将了解如何利用学校的数据故事来识别和解决跨多个领域的不平等。

Reading:

Fowler, D. J., & Brown, K. (2018). Data-driven decisions: Usingequity theory to highlight implications for underserved students.AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 14(4), 18.


Lecture 5:



Objective: Students will understand the necessary elements forcreating equitable learning opportunities.

学生将了解创造公平学习机会的必要因素。

Readings:

Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2020). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: Expanding the conversation toinclude gender and sexuality equity. Gender and Education, 32(2),262-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1496231

Gretter, S., Yadav, A., Sands, P., & Hambrusch, S. (2019).Equitable learning environments in K-12 computing: Teachers' viewson barriers to diversity. ACM Transactions on Computing Education,19(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282939

Verstegen, D. A. (2015). On doing an analysis of equity and closingthe opportunity gap. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 41.https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1809

       



      Lecture 6:


Objective: Students will determine funding and resource gaps thatcreate conditions for inequities in school resources.

学生将决定资金和资源缺口,从而为学校资源的不平等创造条件。

Readings:

Dhaliwal, T. K., & Bruno, P. (2021). The Rural/Nonrural divide? K–12 district spending and implications of equity-based schoolfunding. AERA Open, 7, 233285842098254.https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420982549

Smith, P. S., Trygstad, P. J., & Banilower, E. R. (2016). Wideningthe gap: Unequal distribution of resources for K–12 scienceinstruction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 8.https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2207


Lecture 7:



Summary, and Q&A

最终成果展示、课题答疑



关注官方客服
              
邮箱:contact@legendarymilestone.com
电话:15070341503